THE ROAD TO BIKE-FRIENDLINESS IS A FRUSTRATING CONSTRUCTION ZONE
By Jeanine Birong
I ride a bicycle to work, although not nearly every day, in the city that calls itself the most-bicycle-friendly city in America, although it isn’t close, yet. Showing up for work with disheveled hair and light sheen of sweat still is not widely accepted and the downtown office building where I work doesn’t permit bikes. So most days during the past seven years I’ve gotten from my east Long Beach home to my downtown Long Beach job by car.
By now, I feel a twinge of pride about the way I have learned to work Long Beach; the one-way streets, the mysteries of finding cheap parking and the techniques of parking parallel long ago stopped intimidating me. I can zip across town in 15 minutes. Usually. But recently, getting through downtown has been increasingly difficult, confusing and time-consuming.
It started a few weeks ago when I noticed the installation of traffic lights in the far left lane of Third Street—traffic lights … for a bike lane? I hadn’t heard about that, but if it makes cyclists actually follow traffic laws, bring it! Over the next few days, however, the traffic cones and delineators multiplied, construction expanded and confusion predominated. Then, the mess spread down to Broadway.
All the rules seem to have changed, some for the construction, some forever. For example, the turn into my office parking lot has always been awkward, but now the angle is even stranger. It’s unsettling to cross a bike lane as I turn in and even more so when I exit the lot. With all the new curbs, strange paint lines, blocked alleys and lots and lots of orange, the streets look like abstract art. So does the traffic.
What’s the effect of all this? I love the idea of a bike-friendly city. But I wonder whether a transition like this is making the people friendlier toward cyclists. To me, a lot of folks seem angry. I’ve heard cyclists called “bike Nazis,” and listened to people rail on and on about how ridiculous it is to spend taxpayer dollars on something that only a small segment of the population will use.
As both a motorist and a cyclist, I have tried all the bike improvements to date.
Riding the sharrows on Second Street in Belmont Shore is actually pretty scary. I use these green lanes—meant to be shared by cyclists and motorists—more to make a statement than anything else. But I have been cursed and honked at and closely tailgated by angry drivers when I’ve used the sharrows. And I see other cyclists still using them incorrectly—for example, riding too close to parked cars or not stopping at the lights, and still riding on the sidewalk. It seems everyone is confused.
On Vista, where intersections have been fitted with roundabouts, drivers are confused, too. I have seen them go clockwise instead of counter-clockwise and fail to properly yield the right-of-way. I have seen busses struggle to make the turnaround on Ximeno.
So I ask, is it just me? Is it just the construction? Is “bike friendly” too far outside the box for most drivers? Or are these newfangled bike lanes really going to work?
















10 Comments
Very nicely written, Ms. B. Thanks for the interesting perspective!
Whre are the bike stop signs on First and Second Street through Alamitos Beach? According to this article, that MIGHT lead to a bicyclist actually STOPPING at an intersection rather than blowing right through it because let’s face it – rules of the road don’t actually apply to anyone on a bike. Additionally, since one can’t immediately ascertain the income level of a bike operator, I doubt serious attention to them will be paid by LBPD – for instance – will they ticket a bike rider caught blowing through an intersection on red light camera with equal zeal as those operating motor vehicles?
I too am eagerly awaiting the first of potentially thousands of government claims filed against the city by bike riders hit by motorists turning left from Broadway or 3rd Street. As the writer said – Bring it!
If bike lanes along Broadway and 3rd are such a great idea, why was no environmental study completed? Where is the traffic study that shows the impact of going from 3 east/west lanes to two? What about the traffic that is now pushed to Ocean or 4th Street? Were the the impacts on our neighborhoods considered? How many on street parking spaces have been lost to the bike lanes. Its time for full disclosure.
People are generally afraid of change and this is no different. What we are talking about is making changes to alter the auto-dominance of our public realm for the past half-century. Some changes will be for bikes, other for walking or transit or just living (yes, the sidewalk is one of the most social realms in the city).
While I agree that the cycle-tracks on Broadway and 3rd are a little confusing I think things will be different a year from now. People will start getting used to it and the city will make engineering changes for the final installation (this is just a trial) that should fix issues that arise now. I personally don’t like the crossover left turn lanes and would like to try to consolidate a couple driveways. The cycle-tracks need a little more consistency.
Beyond bike infrastructure these improvements on Vista, Broadway and Third are traffic calming measures. People live on these streets and any changes that reduce the freeway on and off ramp design of the one-way streets through downtown are welcome changes.
Give it time.
I am with BrianU on this one. Obama-mania notwithstanding, most folks tend to be change averse. Most folks enjoy the emotional comfort of routine and stability. This current traffic re-engineering is a distinct change from the norm for most of us and many see it as uncomfortable at best and somehow threatening at worst.
I am all for encouraging more of the community to try bicycling more often and, if not, to at least become more bicycle tolerant when they are driving.
The obverse of that particular coin, of course, is that many, many bicyclists need some serious instruction on the rules of the road and a strong reminder that these rules also apply to them.
Some of the more vocal bicycle activists (e.g. Critical Mass participants and others) would be wise to understand that if they are going to insist upon more respect from motor vehicle drivers, then they must ride on our public roadways in a manner that is worthy of that respect.
I speak from experience, the LAW does ticket bicycle riders who go through red lights/stop signs to the tune of $450!
Yeah,
riding bikes on those sharrows are scary. I feel much safter on either the sidewalk or other side streets.
Also, watch out for pedestrians on the beach bike lane. They’re suicidal.
Yeah, the construction of the 3rd/Broadway bike lanes are a hassle while driving right now, but I’m just waiting to see them in action once they’re finished to tell if the inconvenience goes away or gets worse.
I’m not nearly as annoyed by the bikeways on 3rd/Broadway as I am about the addition of the angle parking spaces and the loss of a well-needed 3rd lane on Shorline Drive out in front of the PF Changs/Outback/Chili’s/Boston Pizza row. Whose lack of brains brainchild was THAT idea?
The bike lanes are a test project. No EIR or traffic study was done because the configuration is under study. If you have concerns about the test bikeways contact your Councilpersons or Charles Gandy at the City of Long Beach. See below quote and link: http://www.bikelongbeach.org/News/Read.aspx?ArticleId=85
“The separated bikeways were approved as a twelve-month demonstration project by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the California Traffic Control Devices Committee (CTCDC). The project allows the City to test the safety and efficiency of this new design. We will conduct studies and if the project is found to be successful, the FHWA and the CTCDC may choose to adopt this design as a standard application that can be used by all cities. A successful project may also allow the City to make the bikeways more permanent by installing landscaped medians. However, if the project is found to be unsuccessful, the bikeways will be removed and the street will be returned to its previous condition. “
Thanks Janis. Did the FHWA and CTCDC also help pay for the installation?