COMMIE GIRL: PEOPLE KEEP MISSING THE POINT OF THE JESSE STEINBERG AWARD
By Rebecca Schoenkopf
The little girl who won this year was a perfect little girl. You could see it in her straight little back and the big, sober eyes in her serious face. You could know it without being told, even before you watched as she won all the other awards too, the ones for Best Student, and Hey Good Job on Your Awesome State Test Scores, and Most Likely to Make Her Teacher Really Love Her a Lot.
My father adored her. “There’s our winner,” he whispered to me with great pleasure as we sat up on the auditorium stage. I adored her too—nobody couldn’t—but it broke my heart. While most of the graduating fifth grade class at least had sort of goodish attendance to win them a “goodish attendance” medal (and several kids had perfect attendance all the way back to kindergarten), and our award winner clearly strived for perfection every day and in every way, there were only three or four kids who won nothing. They did not have even goodish attendance. They did not wear suits or pretty plum-colored dresses for their graduation. They looked grim, and embarrassed, and unhonored. They looked like they might go break something after. One of them really could have used a Jesse Steinberg Award.
We have been giving out the Jesse Steinberg Award to a graduating student almost since my mom began teaching at 61st Street School, and since she retired my dad and I have blown into South L.A. once a year to keep it going. It is named for my brother Jesse, who would be 41 next week, but he was schizophrenic and he hanged himself at home, from a rope swing in the back yard. That was 20 years ago. He was 21 years old.
I never talk about my brother when I give my little speech before we announce the award. I don’t say Here, child, have an award named for a dead person, my late brother, who is totally dead. I just talk about the traits one must have to win it: humor, tenacity (I explain what “tenacity” means), and bravery.
I called my mother after the wonderful ceremony (which included a husky, rosy-cheeked boy—one who’d had perfect attendance since kindergarten—giving a speech about his goals, most of which, adorably, seemed to be “perfect attendance in junior high, high school, and university”). Despite the sweetness of the morning, I was calling my mother to tattle.
“Mom,” I said, “I just really feel like the Jesse Steinberg Award is supposed to go to a kid who’s struggling, who’s not all awesome at school, for whom it would make a difference in the way he feels about school and the way he feels about himself.” (Yes, I do say “for whom” when I’m talking.)
My mother tut-tutted. “Are they giving it out to the best student again?” For years while she was there, teachers would nominate their best kids for the award, and she would have to gently wallop them, explaining over and over again that it should be for a funny kid, a hard kid, a kid for whom things were hard. It should be laurels for a kid who’s not usually honored, one who bounces off the walls a little maybe, who drives you a little crazy perhaps, who’s got a spark in him or her that could blossom if you let it. Jesse was so funny, completely ebullient, raising everyone’s spirits at all times, even when he was moody or mean. He had a cockeyed vision of the world, he was dyslexic, and if I remember right, he flunked first grade. He was always in trouble, he was always generous, and he was strong as a bull.
















7 Comments
Though I’m sad Rebecca deleted my original post, I read her (other) readers very positive responses with great interest.
To a man, they all seem to think she is right, that ALL the children should receive a prize.
Perhaps believing that positive reinforcement will promote good self-esteem and better behavior.
Oscar Wilde said, “Such is the stupidity of optimism.”
And I heartily agree!
Hello Joe. Rebecca did not delete your post—I did. You have a tendency to give false information, and in this case your information about Snoop Dogg was completely wrong. Please honor the responsibility that comes with the privilege of commmenting on this site by making it accurate. Otherwise, you will be banned.
Banned?
I hope you don’t emulate Bill Pearl, the Press Telegram and the other local venues.
Dear Rebecca,
I am not an expert on Long Beach’s favorite son. I was going by an interview he gave years ago.
I wonder if maybe I mixed him up with some “other” gangster rapper???
Certainly I can understand Dave’s not wishing to tarnish Snoop’s reputation!
I very much like the idea of scholarships. I used to have more empathy for unsympathetic people. I no longer do. Probably because of the crime I’ve been victim to, and witness.
Adolph Hitler had a good line, “This struggle which is often so hard kills all pity.”
Though, I very much pity and try to help innocents, dogs being particularly high on my list.
Joe (soon to be banned) Mack
As long as you’re factual, you’re safe. It’s ok to have an opinion, you just can’t throw out any old thing that you think you remember as fact—especially when it concerns somebody else. That stuff about Snoop was just wrong, no matter how you may remember it … or no matter how well it may fit the way you wish things were.
“That stuff about Snoop was just wrong, no matter how you may remember it … or no matter how well it may fit the way you wish things were.”
Wrong? Uh, as in it doesn’t fit into a preferred reality? Not that I REALLY care, Dave. I just think that your use of the word, “wrong” is an odd choice versus, true “or” false?
As per, ‘how well it may fit-in the way “I” wish things were.’
God! If I were writing about the way I WISH things were; then rappers and their ilk would not earn a mention.
Oh no, if I were writing about the way I wish things were, it would be American Musical Overtures, dogs smiling faces and 75 degree weather.
If “I” controlled the way things were.
Joe Mack, I’m obviously spending much more time on this than it is worth, but I want to be clear—-some of the information you included in your comment on Snoop Dogg was INCORRECT, as in FALSE, as in NOT TRUE … and for that reason the comment was removed.