IT GETS YOU THINKING ABOUT THE TEN COMMANDMENTS—AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS
By Dave Wielenga
Hopscotching awkwardly along the line separating church and state, the Bellflower City council on Saturday presented a well-connected private group with free use of a prime plot of public land—for an art installation created in honor of 16th-century Christian leader John Calvin to promote the Ten Commandments.
“This amazing piece of art is perfect for our strong, faith-based community of over 40 churches,” Mayor Ray Dunton told several hundred people who gathered on a lush public lawn on Bellflower Blvd, next to the recently restored historic train station.
Council members Ray T. Smith, Randy Bomgaars, Dan Koops and Scott Larsen—who on March 22 joined Dunton in unanimously approving the two-month donation of public land to a not-for-profit group called Kingdom Causes—sat shoulder-to-shoulder in the front row at Saturday’s unveiling of “Invitation/Decalogue.”
Created by Romanian sculptor Liviu Mocan, “Invitation/Decaligue” consists of 10 finger-like golden pillars arranged in a 25-foot circle. According to the artist, these 16-feet-tall pillars represent the Ten Commandments and are intended to convey the sense of being held in the hands of God. Mocan created the work in 2009 to commemorate the 500th birthday of Calvin, a prominent theologian during the Protestant Reformation.
The sculpture is pretty dramatic.
But is it appropriate for the City of Bellflower to provide free public land to a private organization with an obviously religious agenda?
Bomgaars, who served his first term on the Bellflower City Council in 1988, says the question never came up.
“There was no debating that—whether it is appropriate or not appropriate,” Bomgaars said. “One of our mottos here in Bellflower is that we grow together. I think it’s very fitting and very impressive that [“Invitation/Decalogue”] has come here to a city with such diversity and so many churches.”
But couldn’t one of Bellflower’s more than 40 churches—each of which has tax-exempt status, thanks to the separation of church and state—provide its land to exhibit “Invitation/Decalogue”?
“The people who are presenting it,” Dunton said, “don’t have a church.”
Kingdom Causes is a loose consortium of local faith-based groups—the umbrella organization for a variety of subsidiaries with names like Bless Bellflower, Good Soil Industries and Our Place Housing Solutions. Under the leadership of Ryan VerWys, a strapping and energetic young family man, Kingdom Causes has become integrally active—and increasingly influential—in Bellflower during the past four years. Examples:
• Our Place Neighborhood Resource Center—located in the densely populated, low-income neighborhoods on Eucalyptus St. and Cornuta Ave—offers programs such as after-school tutoring, counseling and community-based social development.
• Good Soil Industries provides landscape and gardening services.
• Our Place Housing Solutions seeks federal funds to rehabilitate homes.
The contributions of Kingdom Causes/Bless Bellflower—the group even took over the city’s Easter Egg Hunt—have become especially valuable during an economic downturn that has curtailed some services.
“We are here that Bellflower might be blessed during a time of economic hardship,” VerWys told the crowd Saturday, “and the mayor cooperated with Kingdom Causes to give us this wonderful location here [for the ‘Invitation/Decalogue’ exhibit].”
When asked after the ceremony whether this partnership—and particularly, the donation of public land for religious expression—might be dangerously close violating the separation between church and state, VerWys denied that Invitation/Decalogue expressed any specific religious viewpoint.
“It doesn’t look like a religious piece of art,” VerWys contended. “It looks like space ships or dragon claws. I could understand some objection if it were crosses—but it looks like an abstract piece of art.”
However, the installation ceremony left little doubt about how “Invitation/Decalogue” is intended to be interpreted—or the significance that it is being displayed on public land.
As a thin white shroud was pulled from each of the long golden fingers, a small brass fanfare blew and each of the Ten Commandments was recited. During a 10-minute talk, Rev. Tom Hocking of the Bellflower Brethren Church exulted over the arrival of Invitation/Decalogue “at a time when the Ten Commandments are being removed from schools and courthouses.” He called the Ten Commandments “the basis of our legal system.”
But VerWys was insistent that Invitation/Decalogue does not constitute a specific religious point of view.
“It’s intended to be a blessing for the whole community,” VerWys said. “It’s intended to promote deep discussion.”
Such as, about the separation of church and state?
Dan Koops, the newest member of the Bellflower City Council, conceded that would be a worthy topic.
“We want to be fair with everybody—we want to be sure that whoever wants to use this property has equal access to it,” Koops said. “We didn’t exactly go on camera with it, but we know what we are getting into. The question is, who is going to be the next group to ask? And who are we going to tell that they can’t use it?”
















20 Comments
Citizen Journalist Quotes of the Day – Growing Up
“People worry about kids playing with guns, and teenagers watching violent videos; we are scared that some sort of culture of violence will take them over. Nobody worries about kids listening to thousands — literally thousands — of songs about broken hearts and rejection and pain and misery and loss.” — Nick Hornby
“Adolescents are not monsters. They are just people trying to learn how to make it among the adults in the world, who are probably not so sure themselves.” — Virginia Satir
“Growing up female in America. What a liability! You grew up with your ears full of cosmetic ads, love songs, advice columns, horoscopes, Hollywood gossip, and moral dilemmas on the level of TV soap operas. What litanies the advertisers of the good life chanted at you! What curious catechisms!” — Erica Jong
(Source: Sunbeams from “The Sun Magazine”)
Reminds me of Stonehenge.
fundie nutbags will never stop pushing the separation wall, we must be ever vigilant.
I have glanced at the Ten-commandments over the years. And athough, I myself don’t follow most of them; I very much wish to associate with people who do!
I could never be a Mormon or Jehova’s witness. But, when when their representatives come to the door, I always buy their literature and offer them a coke.
I just LOVE people who behave themselves, and/or inspire others to do so.
Where is the separation of church and state in the bill of rights? I don’t see it there. Sloppy reporting.
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution reads “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . .” That’s what the Decalogue made me think about. You?
How could anyone argue that the use of public land, supported by taxpayer dollars, should be used to further any religious principles? In truth, there is no stopping these zealots who unabashedly grab any opportunity to shove conservative-based doctrine in our face. This ‘art’ is quite wierd I think, more resembling phallic symbolism than anything else.. wonder how much it cost? I lived in Bellflower for many years and it is a fact that the city has given birth to some of the worst killers ever known.. maybe that is why they think they need so much religion now.
I guess that I struggle to see how allowing a piece of art, which contains no words and is open to interpretation by the viewer, and is available for people to view or not…”establishes religion (or prohibits the free exercise thereof…)” It is not freedom from religion that the framers sought. It is freedom of religion.
Well done Mr. Wielenga. Not being an artist myself, I have a hard time believing anyone who did not read your article will draw any correlation between this piece and religion. As Mr. Verwys stated, it looks like dragon claws to me. As far as the first amendment to the Constitution is concerned, it would do us well to read the Constitution simply for what it states, without bias. How does allowing a religious piece of artwork on public property prohibit the exercise of religion, or, make a law respecting an establishment of religion? It seems to me that if a city made a law banning religious expression, that would be in contradiction to the first amendment. I applaud organizations such as this “Kingdom Causes” that not only educate, feed, clothe and house people in our communities, but also promote art and discussion, while asking for nothing from the government in return except for permission to do so.
Is Congress making a law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exerciser thereof in the local exhibition of this artwork? In context wasn’t this added to assure no state religion was established and no persecution would take place as was happening in those days?
“It is not freedom from religion that the framers sought. It is freedom of religion.”
discredited argument frequently used by those wishing to shove their god down everyones throats. there is well established law stating exactly the opposite. all you need to do is look at the way xtians vilify muslims in this country to realize they arent interested in religious freedom, just forcing their bronze age myth worship on the rest of us.
I don’t see why this shouldn’t be allowed, if the council/city is open to allowing artwork of all sorts. This and that and everything else belongs to our culture and ought to have a place on public land.
People should simply appreciate the art for what it is, and then disagree (or agree) with the message if they want to.
“It doesn’t look like a religious piece of art,” VerWys contended. “It looks like space ships or dragon claws. I could understand some objection if it were crosses—but it looks like an abstract piece of art.”
Or they are Satan’s claws shooting up from Hell….
Dear Hellflower,
I LOVE your line about, ‘Satan’s claws shooting up from Hell.”
I wish I’d said it myself!
Joe
I’ve got an Islamic friend who will be presenting to the Bellflower City Council his proposal to install 42 voluptuous aluminum forms (none of this creepy bronze tentacle sex anime that Bellflower citizens are apparently so fond of) to “abstractly” symbolize the number of virgins he gets if he dies a martyr to his God. Or maybe they will symbolize Jackie Robinson’s number. Depends on how kinky the council is that night. Stay tuned.
Dear Howard,
Obviously you’ve been hurt by Christians in the past. So, I’d like to apologize on behalf of whoever did the damage. Most Christians that I know don’t seek to “vilify muslims in this country”…certainly some who do get a lot of media coverage. Most Christians I know are like Ryan and Kingdom Causes who seek to help those in need.
As far as “discredited arguments” and “well established law stating exactly the opposite”, I’d be interested in hearing more about these. I don’t know who is doing the discrediting. And a law can never stand in conflict to the constitution–that’s what the supremacy clause of the constitution states. The constitution is open for interpretation by the courts but is not defined by the legislature.
Citizen Journalist Quote of the Day: Separation of Church and State
“John Calvin (1509-1564) was a prominent French theologian during the Protestant Reformation and the father of the theological system known as Calvinism. Martin Luther and Calvin are arguably the most significant architects of the Reformation.
“If Luther sounded the trumpet for reform, Calvin orchestrated the score by which the Reformation became a part of Western civilization.”
“Calvin believed that the church should not be subject to the state, or vice versa. While both church and state are subject to God’s law, they both have their own God-ordained spheres of influence.
“For example, the church does not have the authority to impose penalties for civil offenses, although it can call on the civil authorities to punish them. Conversely, the state is not to intrude on the operations of the church. However, it has a duty to protect the church and its ability to function as the church.
“As a magisterial reformer, Calvin thought of the State as a Christian nation rather than a secular government. He did not advocate religious freedom in the same sense as the Baptists later would, for example. However, his ecclesiology sowed the seeds of the modern secular democracy.”
(Source: THEOPEDIA.COM)
[...] [...]
“Dear Howard,
Obviously you’ve been hurt by Christians in the past. So, I’d like to apologize on behalf of whoever did the damage. Lon”
Dear Lon,
If I may answer for Howard. It isn’t the Christians who’ve hurt me/us. It is God himself! So, if you want to apologize for, them?
Joe Mack
sorry lon, havent been hurt by xtians in the past, other than the hurt xtianity causes all of us on daily basis. if you are really interested in hearing more about the discredited arguments i mentioned let me tell you about a little thing called google…