MEDPOT VOTE PREP: GREATER LB RADIO’S ‘FOUR GUYS TALKING ABOUT POT’
By Dave Wielenga
Perhaps you’re having a tough time getting a grasp on the state of medical marijuana in the City of Long Beach.
Here’s the very latest: the agenda for tonight’s City Council meeting includes a scheduled vote on a proposal that would ban medical marijuana dispensaries within the city.
Yes, that ban would pretty much bring the issue back where it was five years ago, before the City set off—with either good intentions or bad intentions, but clearly a short attention span—in pursuit of a policy that would regulate the collectives.
Of course, the agendas of two previous council meeting have also promised a vote on the proposal to ban medpot outlets. Both have been postponed. In fact, the council’s procrastination on this vote epitomizes the so-called process it has applied to its long, costly, confusing—and possibly corrupt—handling of the medical marijuana issue.
Long Beach government has been revealed to be composed of a city council that acts on individual impulses, a City Attorney with his own agenda, a city staff that botched the lottery that awarded permits to investors by buying the wrong sized ping-pong balls for the pneumatic machine and a hovering cadre of well-connected insiders.
So, to repeat, perhaps you’re having a tough time getting a grasp on the state of medical marijuana in the City of Long Beach.
GreaterLongBeach.com has compiled an hour-long online course that will bring you up to speed on the facts and test a couple of opinions, too. It’s called last week’s episode of Greater Long Beach Radio with Dave Wielenga, a k a “Four Guys Talking About Pot.”
During the hour-long program, which either doesn’t feel that long or feels way longer—depending on what we’ll call your “position” on medical marijuana—three journalists who are experts on the issue explain it all to one journalist who knows next nothing about it … but loves to describe the unpredictable course Long Beach has taken toward a policy as a “zig-zag.”
The three smart guys are Nick Schou, fresh from his masterful OC Weekly cover story on the issue; Greggory Moore, the GreaterLongBeach.com theatre critic, who has followed the issue as an advocate, a journalist and a debate opponent for former City Prosecutor Tom Reeves; and Theo Douglas, formerly of the Press-Telegram, OC Weekly, The District Weekly and now an occasional contributor to GreaterLongBeach.com.
The fourth guy—the one who still laughs every time he hears the zig-zag pun—is GreaterLongBeach.com publisher Dave Wielenga, the host of Greater Long Beach Radio.
To listen to that episode of Greater Long Beach Radio with Dave Wielenga, click on this link.
Listen as many times as you like, but please—don’t Bogart that show, my friend
















3 Comments
Isn’t it interesting how City Council decided to allow the 18 medpot facilities recently opened and owned by the politically connected (Long Beach Commissioners, DLBA Boardmembers, etc) to continue to operate, but the other medpot facilities that have been in operation for years must shut down.
Isn’t it interesting how, prior to the most recent Council decision, the medpot facilities owned by the politically connected were NOT raided by Long Beach police while those owned by others were raided by police without warrants, had their possessions and money confiscated and were cited for violating ordinances deemed unlawful by the Court of Appeals.
Apparently Long Beach Police and City Prosecutor’s interpretation of state law and city ordinances extends to everyone EXCEPT the politically connected.
None of this would be an issue if the Council had simply followed existing federal law on the matter and never enacted a medpot ordinance in the first place. It is apparently proving far more difficult for the Council to un-do something they never should have done, than it would have been to never have done it in the first place.
According to coverage of this vote in other local media outlets, the Council selected the 18 or so outlets for grace periods based upon the fact that they appeared to have been in full compliance with the city’s medpot ordinance, while, allegedly, none of the others were.
Is it possible that this was, in fact the case and that “political connections” were not a consideration in the eventual selection of which outlets would be allowed to remain in operation temporarily?
Finally, doesn’t it seem a bit inappropriate for our elected Council to pick and choose from among the duly enacted laws they seem to believe should be followed? A law is a law, is it not? Why, on the one hand, is a local law worthy of due consideration while, on the other, a federal law is not?
Judge rules in favor of marijuana dispensary in Rancho Mirage
http://www.mydesert.com/article/20120313/NEWS01/120313004/Judge-rules-favor-marijuana-dispensary-Rancho-Mirage-