STAR PARKER’S CANDIDACY IS AN INSULTING GOP PLAY FOR BLACK VOTES
By Adreana Langston
This is so freakin’ cynical it makes me want to spit. Laura Richardson was elected to Congress with the support of the majority of African-American Democrat Party voters in California’s District 37. So the Republican Party thinks it can just slap a female African-American face—Star Parker—on its ticket and get enough votes in the 37th District to displace the incumbent?
I’m not denying Laura’s weakness as a candidate. To be sure, she has made some mistakes. But let’s look at Star’s platform:
[ Repealing Obamacare ]
African American adults have higher rates of health problems among both lower and higher income groups.
Star claims that government dependency is a disease that is “gripping” the African-American community, but even at higher-income levels African-Americans remain uninsured at rates higher than that of the majority population.
Conservatives try to paint this disparity of outcomes as the result of individual choices but there is clear evidence that A) The health care system status quo was broken; B) Its brokenness disproportionately resulted in negative outcomes for African-Americans.
Healthcare reform has a significant chance of producing positive outcomes for African-Americans. If Star gets any traction on this issue it will be out of pure Black ignorance.
[ Turning the tide against the stimulus package ]
African-Americans needed a stimulus package more than the majority population.
Analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office supports the President’s assertion that the Stimulus Package averted another Great Depression. The CBO reported that the stimulus package helped to end the recession and created or saved at least two million jobs.
This is particularly significant to African-Americans. A report by the Kirwan Institute states that the group “United for a Fair Economy found that although the U.S. has been in a recession for more than a year, people of color have been in a recession for nearly five years, and have entered a depression during the current economic crisis. Between 2000 and 2007, median black family incomes dropped 1.0 percent for all families the overall decline is the first in a business cycle of this length since WWII. African American homeownership gains were reversed after 2004; they have reverted to 2000 levels.” African-American unemployment right now is 20 percent. The African-American problem with the stimulus package is not that it was too big, but that it was not big enough. Again, if Star gets any traction out of this issue it will be out of pure ignorance.
[ Turning back the tide of high-cost no return welfare programs ]
To what welfare programs is Star referring?
Is she talking about the biggie, Social Security, which takes up 20 percent of the federal budget? Does Star consider keeping old people off the street and out of poverty a “no-return”? Star can’t possibly be talking about Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) — which will together account for 21 percent of the federal budget in 2010. Star declares that she wants to repeal “Obamacare.” Star must know that with health care reform repealed the need for Medicare, which provides health coverage to around 46 million people who are over the age of 65 or have disabilities, will remain high. I imagine the same for CHIP, which offers health care coverage to poor minors. Maybe Star considers giving health care coverage to people can’t access it otherwise to be one of those programs that have “trapped the economically disadvantaged and broken up their families.”
This standard Republican Party platform has significant “barriers to entry” in a strongly Democratic 37th district. Maybe that is why the party higher-ups decided a sweet Black female face was the one most appropriate to carry this bitter banner.
During the last election cycle the GOP tried the same thing at the national level. McCain insulted every thinking independent woman by attempting to hold up Sarah Palin as a foil to the positive coverage Hillary Clinton was getting as the first female with a viable chance of becoming president of the United States. After Obama won the primary, African-American Michael Steele was elected head of the Republican Party in a too-little, too-late “me-too” bid. You see how those worked out.
I understand that this is politics as usual for both parties. I am Black and I am female and Laura Richardson did not get my vote because she was not liberal enough. So I would not give Star Parker a second look. But I’m offended that the GOP thinks I’m so gullible as to actually consider voting for a candidate whose platform is decidedly against what the majority of Black Female-Americans consider to be in their best interests just because the candidate running that platform is a Black-Female-American.
——
EDITOR’S NOTE: Star Parker, Republican nominee for California’s 37th Congressional District, will host a community Town Hall meeting Monday, October 4th, at theLong Beach Petroleum Club, located at 3636 Linden Avenue in Long Beach. The Town Hall will be held from 7:00pm to 9:00pm.
















32 Comments
x
SUPPORTING LINK
See Star Parker’s Campaign Mailer
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/55309522/Starry-Eyed-Cynicism
SUPPORTING LINK
“Laura Richardson was elected with the support of the majority of African-American Democratic voters in District 37″
http://swdb.berkeley.edu/resources/california_journal_links/congress.html#C37
SUPPORTING LINK
“I’m not denying Laura’s weakness as a candidate”
http://www.crewsmostcorrupt.org/node/433
SUPPORTING LINK
“but even at higher income levels African-Americans remain uninsured at rates higher than that of the majority population”
http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Content/News/News-Releases/2006/Aug/Hispanic-and-African-American-Adults-Are-Uninsured-at-Rates-One-and-a-Half-to-Three-Times-Higher-Tha.aspx
SUPPORTING LINK
“Conservatives try to paint this disparity of outcomes as the result of individual choices but there is clear evidence that A) The health care system status quo was broken”
http://www.theroot.com/views/10-reasons-african-americans-should-march-washington-about-health-care
SUPPORTING LINKS
“If Star gets any traction on this issue it will be out of pure Black ignorance.”
http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/site/?q=node/8179
SUPPORTING LINK
“Analysis by nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office supports the president’s assertion that the Stimulus Package averted another Great Depression.”
http://www.newpittsburghcourieronline.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1495:stimulus-plan-averted-second-great-depression&catid=40:opinion&Itemid=54
SUPPORTING LINK
“A report by the Kirwan Institute states”
http://academic.udayton.edu/Race/04needs/economic11.htm
SUPPORTING LINK
“African-American unemployment right now is 20%.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/14/AR2010011404085.html
SUPPORTING LINK
“Again, if Star gets any traction out of this issue it will be out of pure ignorance”
http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=1709
SUPPORTING LINK
“Social Security, which takes up 20% of the Federal budget”
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1258
SUPPORTING LINK
“Does Star consider keeping old people off the street and out of poverty a “no-return”? ”
http://www.socsec.org/feature.asp?issueid=%7b0A45711A-0BF9-46D2-A74E-F47450A624E4%7d
excellent article! i encourage you to use “star parker, self admitted welfare cheat” when referring to her.
I don’t believe Parker is getting much help from the GOP. They are spending money on much more important races elsewhere. Parker got the nomination because nobody else with any significant stature bothered to run. This district is nowhere near close to the demographic makeup that enabled a credible GOP candidate like Steve Horn to win. The 37th District was part of the bi-partisan incumbent protection redistricting plan foisted on Californians back in 2001. Like her or not, Star Parker is actually the most credible/articulate GOP candidate to run since that redistricting scam. You can bet your last dollar that the national GOP is not even thinking about this race. You might hear some lip service to the contrary, but don’t believe it for a second. This seat will belong to Laura until (when/if?) a more credible redistricting plan makes the 37th District more Long Beach-centric. As it stands right now, the 37th is most assuredly a far left-of-center district. The current configuration of this district should be trashed… it’s a joke.
Ms. Langston:
It’s so unfortunate that some who are among the first to imply that others may be racist in action or in motivation are often also among the first to bring up the question of race at all.
To my knowledge, no one who is supporting Ms. Parker is doing so because she happens to be black. To my knowledge they are supporting her because much of what she says makes sense and represents a welcome and sorely-needed departure from the legislative status quo as so aptly represented by Rep. Richardson. But a few points of clarification if I may:
You said: “African American adults have higher rates of health problems among both lower and higher income groups” but the report you’re relying on used a rather strange methodology to arrive at these figures.
“This analysis focuses on non-elderly adults ages 19 to 64 and includes 1,677 non-Hispanic whites, 673 African Americans, and 764 respondents who identified themselves as Latino or Hispanic.”
It seems to me that if the researcher, Princeton Survey Research Associates International, desired to be more accurate in its sampling, it would have called equal numbers of people from each sub-group observed. The numbers in the sub-groups they spoke with seem heavily weighted in one direction and, as a result, hardly a properly balanced or truly representative sampling of African Americans or Latino/Hispanics.
http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Content/News/News-Releases/2006/Aug/Hispanic-and-African-American-Adults-Are-Uninsured-at-Rates-One-and-a-Half-to-Three-Times-Higher-Tha.aspx
Further, the CDC informs us that:
“In addition, three of the 10 leading causes of death for non-Hispanic blacks are not among the leading causes of death for non-Hispanic whites: homicide (sixth), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease (seventh), and septicemia (ninth).”
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5401a1.htm
This would seem to indicate that (allegedly) lesser access to healthcare is not the sole reason that African American adults have higher rates of health problems among both lower and higher income groups.
More later…
You said: “Star claims that government dependency is a disease that is “gripping” the African-American community, but even at higher-income levels African-Americans remain uninsured at rates higher than that of the majority population.”
Your link in support of this attribution, however, does not confirm what you allege that Ms. Parker has claimed. Can you provide another link that does?
I would argue that your statement in response in this quote in no way rebuts what you’ve alleged that Ms. Parker is claiming. Are the two comments in this quote mutually exclusive? Can it not be possible for the African-American community to be in the grip of government dependency and *also* possible that “even at higher-income levels African-Americans remain uninsured at rates higher than that of the majority population?”
All you’ve accomplished with this response is to deflect from the point I think Ms. Parker was trying to make…that she believes too many people in the black community depend upon some sort of government assistance.
If it’s true that Ms. Parker feels that government dependency is a disease that is “gripping” the African-American community, then perhaps she is referring to *all* types of government dependency combined and not simply that which involves health insurance.
USA Today informs us that 1 in 6 Americans currently receives some form of government assistance.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-08-30-1Asafetynet30_ST_N.htm?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Heritage%2BHotsheet&loc=interstitialskip
That some 17% of our citizens currently receive some sort of government assistance is a challenge that I think we should all be very concerned about, regardless of the race or ethnicity of the person receiving government aid. But since Ms. Parker has experienced these challenges, and personally, as they exist within the black community, perhaps she can be excused for seeming to be focused primarily upon that aspect of the challenge?
More later…
You said: “Conservatives try to paint this disparity of outcomes as the result of individual choices but there is clear evidence that A) The health care system status quo was broken; B) Its brokenness disproportionately resulted in negative outcomes for African-Americans.”
Because we live in a free and civil society that is rightly constrained by the rule of law, where human activity and interaction are concerned there will always be a “desparity of outcomes,” Ms. Langston. Were this not true every person on earth would precisely the same level of education, precisely the same income, work for precisely the same company and think and believe in precisely the same things.
But because we, especially in this country, all have free will and are motivated and effected differently and by different things and people, we all move through our lives -wherever it is those lives begin- at different paces and arrive at different locations. Even when we arrive at the same locations, we arrive there at different times, some sooner and some later and, again, for different reasons. Because all of this is true, the individual choices we make, and that others sometimes make on our behalf, have huge impacts and influence upon where we “go,” how we “get there,” when we “arrive,” and whether we ever “arrive” at all.
To discount or to diminish the importance of personal choice in our lives and how we employ it is akin to discounting or diminshing the importance to our daytime of whether the earth turns in such a way as to point us once again toward the sun.
No one that I know of is arguing that our former health care system status quo was not broken. Many simply disagree upon the best, most effective and efficient methods needed to repair it. Those who oppose Obamacare -a segment of our population that is already huge and growing daily- do not believe it is the best, most effective and efficient method by which to repair the things that were broken in our former system.
There exist many other reasonable proposals to correct the obvious challenges in our former system. These alternative proposals were, in,every case, more efficient, less intrusive, less expensive and far less inhibitive of our personal freedoms and individual liberties than Obamacare has proved and will continue to prove to be.
As all of the aspects of Obamacare phase in, I believe we will find that many of the very people that supporters such as yourself most desire to assist will be the very one’s who are harmed to the greatest degree. Already these adverse consequences are being felt as insurance companies drop coverage and shed plans and as more and more physicians stop accepting medicare patients and/or drop the medicare patiemts they had.
You seem to be concerned about disparities in outcomes, Ms. Langston. Perhaps you might be better served to be more concerned about the sorts of disparities that Obamacare will be contributing to and/or directly causing in the coming years…the sorts of disparities that were either fully known, or reasonable could have been known, long before our House of Representatives passed that counter-constitutional monstrosity in the middle of the night (11:37pm EST) by just 5 votes.
No Republicans voted for Obamacare. None. But 33 Democrats voted *against* it.
Perhaps, Ms. Langston, just perhaps, there were some very good reasons that the Congressional opposition to Obamacare proved to be bi-partisan, while the Congressional support for it came from only one side of the aisle…the side that, I think, was typified by House Speaker Pelosi when, on March 9, 2010, less than two weeks before the final House vote, she said:
“…But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it…”
Ms. Langston, I submit that such an approach is *not* governing, it is guess work. It is *not* legislative responsibility, it is a thorough abdication of that responsibility.
I happen to think we deserve to be better served in Congress than that. Apparently Ms. Parker does too.
More later…
You said: “Healthcare reform has a significant chance of producing positive outcomes for African-Americans. If Star gets any traction on this issue it will be out of pure Black ignorance.”
I would agree with you that effective healthcare reform can certainly produce or, at the very least, facilitate positive outcomes, for all in our nation and not just for one group or another. But Obamacare is not that sort of reform. Obamacare represents the sort of reform that, if not repealed, I think will eventually do our society and every person in it far more harm than good and for many generations of Americans to come.
If Ms. Parker is able to convince more people of this than the millions -of all political persuasions- who have *already* been convinced, it will not be out of ignorance, black or otherwise. It will be as a result of a clearer and more thorough understanding of Obamacare and it’s many detrimental effects than those who continue to support it seem to be able to achieve, or, having achieved it, seem willing to be completely intellectually honest and admit to.
its getting thick in here!
Go Star!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are being maligned as the “token” candidate for the Republican party. I smell fear in the air. I hope you clean Richardson’s clock, and then some.
Besides destroying America, leftism is destroying the black community… but, you think that things need to be even further left? I’ve always read that the black community is really a conservative community, so I wonder how many other black females feel the same way as you do. I have always thought the black vote to be more leftist in orientation, but when reading how the black community tends to be conservative, I have to wonder what is the true story here.
The fact is that Star Parker is a Faux News schill who demonizes and profits off the marginalized. A hypocrite in the first order that makes vast generalizations particularly about black women by projecting her past pathological lifestyle upon them. Now Parker is anti- choice after having had 4 abortions, basically using it as birth control. Her party affiliation has nothing do with any disdain thinking people have about her, it’s that she’s supported by a war criminal Karl Rove and a slacker half term Governor Sara Palin who quit her job and wackadoodle Glen Beck. She claims that goverment isn’t necessary but she has a 501C3 which I suspect has helped no one but her bank account. Get a real job Star in the private sector like my mother, sisters, and many women of color have done and still are doing. Your screed against welfare recipients of which you happened to have been one and admitted to frauding is hollow at least and disingenous at best. Your buffoonish behavior typfies typical “reich” wing lunacy whom advocate against the middle class for the benefit of the very very few. Against minimum wage, environmental standards, science and being hyper religious, we had that it’s passe Ms. Parker. Yes Laura Richardson needs to be replaced but not by a dishonest Faux News clown, and yes you do come off as a clown saw you on the View. Terribly embarrasing.
There really is one thing upon which all Americans should agree, no matter their demographic or ethnicity. Free and respectful discourse around a diversity of ideas is never deserving of the type of vicious attack and name-calling provided by A. Okey. I think everyone was enjoying this debate until it hit that ho-hum, predicatable nadir. Kudos to Ms. Parker for mustering the kind of rare courage it takes to refuse to regurgitate an indoctrination, for taking an unpopular position. It also cannot be disputed based on the factual record that she took many positive and difficult actions toward improving her own life after it had gone in a very wrong direction. It would appear that she subsequently she turned her energies toward helping others to do the same thing. I will try to find the time to look for “supporting links” or testimonials because at this point that is just a hunch based on what I’ve read at this and a couple of other websites. I did not catch her on ‘The View’ because I cannot stomach those cackling hens on the View. I believe that she’s done good things for others despite the passionate yet completely baseless A. Okey supposition that she is just a fraud. I hope I have time to do more research on this remarkable woman but I have one of those very demanding “real jobs” in the private sector that I don’t for one minute believe is more noble than the work Ms. Parker is or has been doing, although I’d wager it is probably is a good deal more lucrative.
Truth hurts. She’s a carpet bagging poverty pimp backed by the worst elements of the GOP. Nothing I wrote about her is false. Imagine you work hard all your life and you have someone with Stockholm Syndrome spouting nonsense that just because I look like her I lived her life of debauchery. What I would suggest is you check out alumni from LB Poly that are black we’ve had some major successes of women and men who didn’t cheat the welfare system. One being Robyn Peterson who is about to become President of LB Transit from the 37th District, as well as Dr. Dana Scott a physician at UCLA/Westwood, also a Poly alumni, even Snoop Dog also a Poly Alumni and the list goes on. Would you like it if someone who moved into your neighborhood a year ago insulted your entire community as being slackers. Again I contend Ms. Parker has a serious problem of projecting her pitiful life onto others who look like her.
I don’t have to “imagine” that. Good luck with your issues and all of your obsessions, personal demons and whatnot. I truly do hope that one day you can overcome these. Living mired in anger, hatred and disgust must feel pretty terrible day in and day out.
Here’s her non-profits tax return see for yourself. 50% salaries to her and family members and 50% on expenses. Nothing to reduce poverty only speech’s railing against gay people.
http://dynamodata.fdncenter.org/990_pdf_archive/311/311467594/311467594_200812_990.pdf
http://dynamodata.fdncenter.org/990_pdf_archive/311/311467594/311467594_200712_990.pdf
Don’t donate money to her cause because she’s pocketing to live off still a scammer. Guess she doesn’t hate the government too much as she attempted to get a government job with excellent bennies. There should be no respect for criminals.
any yet amazingly enough, it sure sounds like you hold some respect for “former” crip, ex-con, drug-pusher, suspected accomplice to murder, and repeatedly violent assailant, the honorable and esteemed, Snoop Dogg. Lucky for him he has been arrested for most of his crimes after having taken enough of your community’s money in order to hire the most expensive attorneys available to repeatedly get him off.
I have respect for people that work hard. Put aside Snoop’s stupidity and he is still a better person than Star and he has created jobs and doesn’t live off a fake non profit. He’s married to his high school sweetheart who never relied on welfare or abortions. Compared to Parker I pick Snoop.
Ms. Parker once helped rob a liquor store at gunpoint, aborted four babies in two years, and bilked the welfare system out of thousands of dollars.
Wow I’m sure there are thousands of black women you can admire without elevating this simpleton. Here’s some names, Constance Rice, Condi’s first cousin, Mrs. Colin Powel. Here’s a link for you.
http://www.blackenterprise.com/top-75-women/
Lazy ass Star is not on the list.
Seriously put yourself in the shoes of the millions of black women who never relied on welfare and worked their asses off only to be degraded by a charlatan like Parker.
Definition of a wingnut welfare queens as people who:
a.) Have very little talent.
b.) Work in the right-wing media machine, think-tank circles, or the Republican Party.
c.) Are employed solely on their willingness to act as shills for the GOP or wingnuttery in general.
Dear Mr. Grant,
Now that Ms. Parker lost and lost decidedly and neither one of us has an ax to grind, I want to point out that I did not call Star Parker a racist. I called the GOP cynical for attempting to use an attractive Black woman to promote a platform that the majority of Black voters in the 37th district (female or otherwise) do not think is in their best interest. You can, and did, argue eloquently about whether or not the GOP platform truly is or is not in the best interest of Black people, people who are not in the top 5% of wealth holders in the U.S., people who think environmental sustainability is important, whatever. But in the 37th district Ms. Parker’s platform did not resonate with voters. She is a good looking, well spoken woman who articulated her platform well and who had a campaign chest twice as big as her opponents. That means she had the money to get her message out there. And guess what, it was not well received in the 37th district. She got trounced, taking in only 29% of the vote. I did not attack Star Parker. I attacked her platform, her positions, and the political cynicism of her party in running her in this district.
[...] Long Beach, September 30, 2010 Star Parker’s Candidacy is an Insulting GOP Play for Black Votes Article about African Americans and the stimulus references a report by the Kirwan [...]