A HOUSE-TO-HOUSE SEARCH PARTY FOR SCOFFLAW CATS? GET MEOWTTA HERE!
By Louise Cunningham
“Door-to-Door Crackdown on Dog and Cat Licenses Begins,” screamed the headline of the Press-Telegram on July 29. Crackdown? Only about five minutes ago the Mayor’s cat was lounging on the front page, getting his license. Now a house-to-house search party for scofflaw cats?
First, I am not a Crazy Cat Lady! (Or a bad Nixon impersonator.) I’m not against this effort to cut down on cats wandering the streets, and creating other unwanted cats in the process. I know there are about 200 cats in the animal control shelter right this minute that may not make it another day.
But I am against this seemingly fascist attempt to help bail the city out of the red with another revenue idea. My rights fly out the window when a citation for an unlicensed cat is left on my door because I’m not home—with the prospect of a third violation resulting in a fine. What happened to innocent until proven guilty?
According to a representative of Long Beach Animal Control Services, staff members are more than happy when helpful neighbors point out units where there are animals, even if they are house pets. Reminds me of a phrase from the The John Birch Society song: “If your mommy is a commie / then you gotta turn her in.” Today they’d sing “It’s a pity ‘bout your kitty / but I gotta rat her out.”
That said, I’m now in panic mode. I don’t want the storm troopers getting my 16-year-old Kitty. She’s had cancer surgery, major dental surgery and suffered the loss of her housemate-daughter recently. She hardly eats and seems to be losing her sight. She hasn’t got the energy to run away from home, let alone go out a late-night “date.”
I don’t want to subject Kitty to a car ride to the vet. Cats don’t stick their heads out the window and dangle their tongues out in the breeze like Fido loves to do; they hunker under the gas pedal and shriek to the high heavens. Then there’s the rabies shot which some feel is more hazardous to an older cat than the threat of the disease (find me a case of cat rabies outside of a farming town).
It’s also mandatory to prove the cat has been spayed. That was 14 years ago, people. Who knew some little receipt from the ASPCA in 1996 would come in handy in 2010? Especially when it was the ex-husband who took Kitty for the surgery. A man who couldn’t remember to carry his driver’s license would not come home and create a new file labeled “Important Cat papers.” So there’s another vet expense to have Kitty examined and verify her surgery. The total on this “free” license is adding up.
So, what to do? I’m out of control, my overactive mind racing. Nothing left but to go underground. A new version of a Paul McCartney song keeps me humming “Cat on the run…..cat on the run!”
Think, Louise … what have other fugitives done?
Anne Frank! Hide in an attic in Amsterdam! Nah, won’t work; above me is someone else’s unit.
Saddam Hussein! Dig a spider hole in the basement! Nope, no basement—that’s somebody else’s unit, too.
The Barefoot Bandit! Steal a plane and fly to the Bahamas! Fat chance—Kitty wouldn’t ride in a little red wagon, let alone a small plane.
I know! Disguise her! That’s it! I’ll dress up Kitty, and when they come knocking for her I’ll play it cool: “Nothing to see here, officers, just a couple of sock monkeys on the book shelf.” A search of the Internet for cat clothes yields lots of sites that think it’s me that wants to dress like Cat Woman. Closest I could come was www.spoiledrottenkitties.com. Kitty in a pirate costume doesn’t seem very doable. She’d never go for the eye patch, and forget a wooden paw.
Meanwhile, while I am out buying cat food and litter at a store in another county (can’t be too careful to avoid running into neighbors with allergies who might put the clues together), I have visions of Kitty at the computer furtively searching out countries without cat extradition laws. Far away safe places … Cat-mandoo, Purrsia, Cat-alina. (Cats don’t spell well and they are punsters).
Boy, is my dander is up! (Dander, by the way, is defined on the Internet as “scurf from the fur of animals.” What th–? I’ve got no time to Google scurf!).
Later, I take a breath and realize that I may eventually have to cave in to the Establishment (and turn in my 60’s hippie membership). But I worry about older ladies with several cats—both the lady and the cats both being frail and probably living on a small income. What will happen to cats who did no harm by living quietly in a house where crocheted doilies grace the arm chairs? Is there no way to “grandfather” these older companions in? My 20-year old car didn’t have to endure a smog examination and pay a fee, for cripes sake.
I’d never forgive a government that forced me to give up my best friend. My eyes fill up just thinking about coming home after a long day, turning the key in the lock and knowing that my little 5-½ pound girl is not there waiting and looking up expectantly as the door opens.
















15 Comments
I think this column deserves a “Purr-litzer” for sure! A real problem, but presented in a hysterically funny piece. Don’t gov. folks have better things to do than come up with this silly piece of law? And that in can be enforced by gestapo tactics is scary.
Yes, if one knows of someone keeping 20 plus cats, that’s a health hazard to people as well as the cats, and it’s reasonable for a concerned neighbor to turn that party in to animal control authorities. But encouraging neighbors to turn each other in for one, two, or even three, healthy and well kept cats is just too Big Brother-ish.
Let’s hope Miss Kitty will be safe from any rat fink neighbors, and the animal cops, too. She sounds like a real sweet old gal! My two cats (unlicensed as well, but they live in a different jurisdiction) join me in wishing her and her human well.
I look forward to reading more of Louise’s columns! Keep ‘em coming!
This column deserves a “Purrlitzer” for sure. A hysterically funny piece. Do’t gov. folks have better things to do than passing a law like this, and worse, encouraging neighbors to rat each other out.
Wishing Miss Kitty & Louise well!
The city is using taxpayers resources to hunt down the owners of unlicensed cats (when the licenses are free), yet this is the same city that for years ignored going after the $1.2 million they were losing by not licensing check cashing businesses.
The city is using taxpayers resources (when we are broke) to hunt down the owners of unlicensed cats (when the licenses are free), yet this is the same city that ignores illegal immigrants, garages converted to living areas, code violations and late night crime and disturbances in Belmont Shore.
In the last two years our city has dictated to its residents when they can water their lawn and that their cats must have licenses. Considering how broke this same leadership has caused our city to become over the past 4-years, can they have their priorities any more screwed up?
This city has ALWAYS been “run” in a mysterious manner Mike. Does seem to get worse though. Sid Soloman (long-time community activist LBACI) is furiously spinning in his grave.
Well, Louise, you managed to entertain the folks that hate the city; well done, but pathetic! Your use of innocent cats and a proactive program that has the potential to save their lives in a number of ways and your inappropriate mention of Anne Frank is less than distasteful. Katrina is a perfect example of animals that would have been saved if they had a form of identification, but they didn’t. Thousands of pets were never reunited with their families. It cost millions of dollars to help these displaced pets. Like it or not, when pets cost Long Beach taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars because their guardians refuse to be responsible, it is time for the City to step in. Instead of worrying about little old ladies with several cats, worry about how the cats are very possibly breeding, due to lack of being sterilized. I have helped many of these ladies get their strays and ferals fixed. How about you, Louise, how many little old ladies have you helped lately? By the way, my 90 year old neighbor never missed buying her lottery ticket, but some how could not manage to get all of her cats fixed. And no, this is not a– seemingly fascist attempt to help bail the city out of the red with another revenue idea.– It is, however, an attempt to help the felines of Long Beach. Licensing provides: a lost pet recovery system, it helps to elevate cats status in society, it helps Long Beach Animal Care Services return cats to their families, which, in turn, lowers the euthanasia rate. With fewer cats entering the shelter, the animals already there have a longer stay helping to increase adoptions. And yes, it has the potential to increase revenue which in turn will help with education and s/n assistance for the community and those “little old ladies” who are on a tight budget. Visit the NACA and CDC website. So come on, relax, meditate, and above all else, get your thyroid and hormones checked!
Sometimes when we don’t agree with a policy, to protest it one might consider doing the exact opposite of what authority would expect. INstead of defying the law–what if you completely embraced it? I would like to introduce you to the concept of “malicious compliance.” It comes especially in handy when your boss tells you to do something you know will be dumb. Do it exactly as ordered. The result is always hilarious.
And the best part is not saying “I told you so.”
Imagine if every pet owner in town suddenly showed up en masse to register–what would LBAC actually do?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_compliance
Oh boy, no matter how hard people try, other people simply can not be educated. This simple tool of licensing is not punitive, it is a lost pet recovery source. LBACS would “embrace” the fact that cats are being helped; that’s what they would do! Hopes this helps you, Jeanine!
Love the piece. I find it typical of the city to insist we have to license our cats, without deciding what the annual fee will be yet. Nice.
I, too, refuse to put my senior kitties in the car and pay the vet to look at their private parts to make sure they were fixed. The vet no longer has that paperwork on file.
When looking at the Animal Control website, they stress the rabies shots are required due to an increasing number of cats getting rabies. They site a 2004 article. HOWEVER, if you look at the State website (http://www.cdph.ca.gov/healthinfo/discond/Pages/rabies.aspx), it clearly states there have been ZERO cases of Cat Rabies in the ENTIRE state this year (2010), and last year (2009). There was ONE case in 2008 in Humboldt and ONE case in 2007 in Trinity… yes, very very far from Long Beach.
So the city simply lies to try to charge us fees? I had a guy ask me if the city was going to start charging for fish licenses… Well, why not? I mean, it’s the city’s water, and, if the aquarium breaks, the paramedics may have to be sent out if someone got cut on the glass.
PS: This ordinance will not keep cats from being “put down”. Instead, I have had people, who are already struggling, tell me that they are overwhelmed by all of this and may just have to drop their pets at the shelter. It’s like it’s the last straw for those who are trying to keep their homes or pay their rents.
If people have their cats micro-chipped, then what is the difference between having a license or not? It’s still the same info.
Mandatory licensing of any animal does not guarantee they won’t be dumped or abandoned when their owners won’t or can’t care for them any longer.
The city may conduct occaisional “sweeps” for errant unlicensed animals but consistent compliance enforcement is impossible.
It all comes down to being a now-and-then revenue generator.
http://www.cfainc.org/articles/sfspca.html
SF and SD both considered and refjected this policy for very good reasons. It doesn’t improve the situation. Please read the link above which is the clearest expression of the reasons it doesn’t work as advertised. But Long Beach thinks they will be “Leaders in Cat Management.”
http://www.cfainc.org/articles/sfspca.html
SF and SD both considered and refjected this policy for very good reasons. It doesn’t improve the situation. Please read the link above which is the clearest expression of the reasons it doesn’t work as advertised. But Long Beach thinks they will be “Leaders in Cat Management.”
PET LICENSING
California state law requires that all dogs over the age of four months be vaccinated against rabies, and be licensed through the local animal care and control agency.
“The County of Los Angeles requires the same provisions, and also requires rabies vaccination and licensing for cats”.
Licensing is an important means of identification and can help you find your pet if it becomes lost. License revenues are a vital means of support to help the Department promote and protect human and animal safety.
Failure to license your pet may result in fines, penalties and/or citations.
“The LA Department employs over 50 license enforcement officers to ensure licensing compliance”.
Animal licenses may be purchased by completing the license application form and mailing it, along with the license fee payment, proof of rabies vaccination and proof of sterilization, to the address on the application. You may purchase a designer tag by completing this additional form and submitting it with the license application. Designer tags contain your personal contact information on the reverse side of the official license and cost an additional $15.
Designer tag sale proceeds are used to enhance animal care at our shelters.
I did some research to see if there is any law that makes our city proceed with going door to door to see if owners are getting their cat licensed…this is what I found.
Door-to-Door canvassing has been a regular activity in the City of Long Beach since the 1960’s.
Periodically, the City contracts with the County of Los Angeles to supplement license compliance efforts.
The Federal Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommends dog and cat licensing,
and door-to-door canvassing as an integral method to enhance rabies control (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, April 18, 2008).
The process of license canvassing results in direct contact with pet owners and provides the opportunity for education about animal care issues.
It is also provides residents with the opportunity to report animal-related violations such as neglect, cruelty, barking, defecation, off-leash and excessive numbers of animals on a property.
A quick survey of animal control directors in Los Angeles and Orange counties identified (48) agencies utilized door-to-door dog license canvassing during 2009-2010 to ensure compliance with state laws.
For additional licensing information call 562-570-7387
[...] A HOUSE-TO-HOUSE SEARCH PARTY FOR SCOFFLAW CATS? GET MEOWTTA HERE [ By Louise Cunningham ] [...]